Justification that banks need to fork out massive payouts to retain top talent is a fallacy?ref http://guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/18/bonuses-for-fruit-pickers-not-bankers "more complex task of doing maths, incentives served to worsen performance" "Now for the other argument, that financial institutions need incentives to keep these superstars. That fallacy is neatly... | |
Bankers...Footballers....They need to be paid top dollar.
But hang on...how come the Sunday football teams can manage without any pay whatsoever.
I'd rather go banking on a sunday than play football.
So that's bollox...innit.
That's not even new information. Studies have been saying this for years.
I agree that the people around the so-called "top performers" often don't get the credit they deserve and the so-called "top performers" take credit they don't deserve.
