Both are bad and possibly orchestrated by the same people, carbon credits will turn out to be much worse.
While the bailouts were a bigger heist in the short term, over the long term carbon credits will cost taxpayers a lot more money.
Like all Liberal scams, ultimately it is the Middle Class who will end up being shafted with higher taxes.
But this only the beginning, Liberals will use the Global Warming hoax to find new ways to tax everyone, then they will whine when more jobs are lost and the cost of living begins to skyrocket.
If you accept the premise that these 2 actions are indeed heists, then you would have to go with carbon credits. The bailouts have a relatively sort cycle whereas the credits are endless and have no half life. Their cycle is self perpetuating and are endless in number. This answer does not imply by the way that I do not think that both contain a degree of scam properties.
There is alot of money in both. Carbon credits would involve more money over a period of time, but the bailouts will clearly win the short term because there is an enormous amount of capital available to banks.
Carbon Credits. We will be paying billions for that scam forever. That is in addition to the bank bail outs.
Flip a coin and know that it is operated by the same people: Bush, Obama, Soros and the rest of the Gorboni Crime Family.
Bernie Madoff was far bigger than both combined. The crash of AIG and Goldman Sachs also much bigger.
Ahhh the greed of going green. The new capitalism
Hats off to you !!!
One is well understood whereas the other is ongoing.
Can I get a credit for planting a shrub in my backyard?
allow weeds to grow uncontrollably?
carbon crdits.
